CURRICULUM COMMITTEE
College of Letters and Sciences
Meeting of March 5, 2009
PRESENT: Ellen Davis, Paul House, Pilar Melero,
Jennifer Thibodeaux, Trudy Witonsky, Geetha Samaranayake,
Steve Sahyun,
Jolly
Emrey, Elizabeth
Olson, Larry Neuman, Debra Heiber
and
Elizabeth Hachten,
Chair.
The minutes of the January 22, 2009
meeting were approved on a Davis/House motion.
Announcements:
The chair announced that next fall is a new catalog year
and that departments should review their programs and make any
corrections needed. The deadline for getting changes in the
catalog is our first meeting of the Fall semester, September 3rd.
The committee was also reminded that we have 3 more meetings is
semester in which to get changes made. They are April 2, April
16, and April 30.
The chair announced that the 498R has been approved. The
question was asked if the 498R would be available in the fall and if so
what needs to be done to activate it. Also when can departments start
adding it to the curriculum and can the addition of this course to all
programs in a department be done on one form. The chair will
check on this.
Olson/Emrey moved to
approve the
new course
PSYCH 407
"Psychology of Emotion and Motivation." The motion passed
unanimously.
Melero/Neuman
moved to approve the new course SPANISH 484 "
Women Writers of Spain and the
Americas." The motion passed unanimously.
Emrey/Olson moved to approve
the new
course POLISCI_ASIANST
480 "Government and Politics of Japan." The motion passed
unanimously.
Thibodeaux/Neuman
moved to approve the new course RELIGST 304
"Contemporary Islamic Thought and Practice." The motion passed
unanimously.
Sahyun/Olson moved to receive and record the following
informational items:
Number
change and requisite change for the "Introduction to the
Scientist-Practitioner Disciplines in Psychology" course FROM PSYCH 446
TO PSYCH 327.
Requisite
change for PSYCH
345_545 "Abnormal Psychology."
Delete PSYCH 646
"Introduction to the Scientist Practitioner Disciplines in Psychology."
The chair requested that we add discusson of the super majors
vs. the traditional major/minor to the agenda. The
committee approved. Thus
the issue was again discussed.It
was the consensus of the committee
representatives that minors add breadth and depth to a student’s
educational experience.However, a super
major could have a place in
the curriculum given an adequate justification for it.It was then suggested that we should clarify
what constitutes adequate justification at a future meeting.It was
brought out that there seemed to be several possible justifications: 1)
To prepare
students for graduate or professional studies in the discipline (e.g. Scientist-Practitioner Graduate School
Preparation Emphasis) or 2) to provide a multidisciplinary program
through a
unique combination of courses not found in existing major/minor.There was also discussion on whether a super
major would be justified as a marketing tool for an existing
major/minor.Most of the committee felt
that the purpose
of a degree in an L&S program was to provide the student with a
broad liberal
education rather than skill development.The
question was raised as to whether or not requiring a
minor was the
only path to insuring a broad education.It
was suggested that the super major could possibly fulfill
that role
if it was distinct from a combination of a major and a minor in the
same
discipline